Reported cases:
- T (A Child: Care Order: Beyond Parental Control: Deprivation of Liberty: Authority to Administer Medication) [2017] EWFC B1 - Lisa acted for Leeds City Council in this notable case which raised significant questions regarding the discretion of the local authority to permit the administration of medication to a looked after child without parental consent, the deprivation of a child’s liberty, and limb two of the threshold test (beyond parental control) (www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2018/B1.html)
Notable cases:
- Re H, 2017 - Lisa acted for grandparents in care proceedings who were seeking to care for their 1-year old grandson in place of placement for adoption proposed by the local authority. The local authority accused the grandparents of being complicit in the malnutrition of their 1-year old grandson. After thorough examination of the medical experts, the Court was satisfied that the grandparents were blameless and in the spirit of W v Neath Port Talbot [2013] EWCA Civ 1227 compelled the local authority to provide a care plan for a supervision order which was duly ordered. The instructing solicitor, Catherine Gaskell commended Lisa for her efforts; “the result Lisa has obtained for these family members is outstanding!”.
- Re N, 2018 – Lisa was Junior to Ian Skelt acting for the Police in a case concerning the disclosure of highly sensitive information into family proceedings. The case centred around an allegation of forced marriage and honour based violence for which the parents were later successfully prosecuted. The Police made an application to withhold material due to a real risk to life should it be disclosed. Lisa prepared and, at times, presented legal arguments focused on Convention Rights in closed sessions in the High Court. The material remained undisclosed.
- Re J, 2019 – Lisa acted for an intervenor who sought to re-open a finding of fact having been identified as the sole perpetrator of life-threatening injuries to a 2-year-old child whom she was caring for at the time the injuries were sustained. The intervenor was subject to care proceedings concerning her son at the time.
- Re S, 2019 – Lisa acted for a local authority in a case concerning a non-accidental injury (broken bones) to an 11-day old baby. Initially there were 7 potential perpetrators which, upon advice, was reduced to 2 (the parents) who both disputed being present at the time of the injury. This case required robust questioning of the expert, the parents and lay witnesses to narrow the timeframe of the injury and a revision of the findings sought by the local authority to ensure the Court was persuaded to make findings regarding location and timing of the injury as well as the possible perpetrators.
- Re D, 2019 – Lisa acted for a mother in care proceedings who was accused of coaching her children into alleging serious sexual abuse by their father and for physically assaulting one child. Following advice, the mother ultimately put forward her mother as a long-term carer of the children and avoided what would likely have been very serious findings. Lisa called the grandmother as witness and the Court was persuaded that the children should be cared for by the grandmother whilst an assessment was undertaken late on in the proceedings.